Anti-Personnel Mines

MarkOU · 02-22-2012, 04:11 AM

The United States supports the use of Anti-Personnel Mines and they have not signed the
Ottawa Treaty which bans the use of said mines.

How about we create a buffer zone between the US and Mexico and mine it so we can control the inflow of illegals?

I would rather we invade Mexico and make it US Territory. Tax em, put people to work bringing their infrastructure up to our standards and drill the shit out of the land for oil and gas. Come on, lets be real. We need energy, jobs and land. Taking over Mexico is a viable solution. Why would mexicans resist it? They want to come here and fufill the American Dream, well lets bring the dream to them and kill a bunch of drug runners in the process ooh and legalize marijuana.

fordman84 · 02-22-2012, 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MarkOU

The United States supports the use of Anti-Personnel Mines and they have not signed the
Ottawa Treaty which bans the use of said mines.

How about we create a buffer zone between the US and Mexico and mine it so we can control the inflow of illegals?

I would rather we invade Mexico and make it US Territory. Tax em, put people to work bringing their infrastructure up to our standards and drill the shit out of the land for oil and gas. Come on, lets be real. We need energy, jobs and land. Taking over Mexico is a viable solution. Why would mexicans resist it? They want to come here and fufill the American Dream, well lets bring the dream to them and kill a bunch of drug runners in the process ooh and legalize marijuana.

Nah, don't need to increase the number of welfare mouths. Just let em keep sending over their hard workers, amnesty them without voting rights for 9 years (so that GOP doesn't say it is just a Dem ploy to get votes), and get those workers into the tax base. Let Mexico keep the welfare types...

and still legalize weed.

JuiceTheGator · 02-22-2012, 08:36 AM

We don't need land mines because we already have heat vision robotic machine gun stations. Those would be deployed on the border if we had a good Prez. You have to program them to go for head shots to protect coyotes but take out the chukacabra.

02-22-2012, 04:11 AM	#1
MarkOU Bowl Mania Champ 2011 Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Wherever I may Roam Posts: 2,164 Rep Power: 5025	Anti-Personnel Mines The United States supports the use of Anti-Personnel Mines and they have not signed the Ottawa Treaty which bans the use of said mines. How about we create a buffer zone between the US and Mexico and mine it so we can control the inflow of illegals? I would rather we invade Mexico and make it US Territory. Tax em, put people to work bringing their infrastructure up to our standards and drill the shit out of the land for oil and gas. Come on, lets be real. We need energy, jobs and land. Taking over Mexico is a viable solution. Why would mexicans resist it? They want to come here and fufill the American Dream, well lets bring the dream to them and kill a bunch of drug runners in the process ooh and legalize marijuana. __________________ BOOMER SOONER Last edited by MarkOU; 02-22-2012 at 04:13 AM.

02-22-2012, 08:36 AM	#3
JuiceTheGator Engorged Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Sw Florida Posts: 11,339 Rep Power: 32508	We don't need land mines because we already have heat vision robotic machine gun stations. Those would be deployed on the border if we had a good Prez. You have to program them to go for head shots to protect coyotes but take out the chukacabra. __________________ All I really want is to learn something new and interesting. Surprise me dumbass.